3D Printing ProcessesAM ResearchMaterialsMedicalMicro 3D printingResearch & Education

Researchers turn 3D printing “inside out” with printed ice

Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University have developed a high-speed, reproducible fabrication method that enables the printing of microscale ice structures

Stay up to date with everything that is happening in the wonderful world of AM via our LinkedIn community.

Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University have developed a high-speed, reproducible fabrication method that turns the 3D printing process “inside out.” They developed an approach to 3D print ice structures that can be used to create sacrificial templates that later form the conduits and other open features inside fabricated parts.

According to an article uploaded to TechXplore, by Lynn Shea from the Carnegie Mellon University Mechanical Engineering, big scientific breakthroughs often require inventions at the smallest scale. Advances in tissue engineering that can replace hearts and lungs will require the fabrication of artificial tissues that allow for the flow of blood through passages that are no thicker than a strand of hair. Similarly, miniature ‘softbotic’ (soft-robot) devices that physically interact with humans safely and comfortably will demand the manufacture of components with complex networks of small liquid and airflow channels.

Advances in 3D printing are making it possible to produce such tiny structures, but challenges remain for those applications that require very small, smooth, internal channels in specific complex geometries. The 3D printing of these geometries using traditional processes requires the use of support structures that are can be difficult to remove after printing, and printing these models using layer-based methods at a high resolution can often take a long time, and compromise geometric accuracy.

Akash Garg, a Ph.D. student in mechanical engineering, and Saigopalakrishna Yerneni, a postdoctoral associate in chemical engineering, developed the process and conducted studies under the direction of Burak Ozdoganlar, Philip LeDuc, and Phil Campbell – professors in mechanical and biomedical engineering.

“Using our 3D ice process, we can fabricate microscale ice templates with smooth walls and branched structures with smooth transitions. These can subsequently be used to fabricate microscale parts with well-defined internal voids,” said Akash Garg.

Water is exceptionally well-suited for use in bioengineering applications – considering that it is the most abundant substance on the Earth’s surface and the primary building block of any living organism. The simple and rapid phase transition of water to ice provides exciting opportunities for using water as an environmentally friendly structural material.

“It doesn’t get any more biocompatible than water,” said Akash Garg.

The team uses the printed ice structures as sacrificial templates for “reverse molding”, or inside-out 3D printing. The ice structures are submerged into the liquid or gel form of a chilled structural material, such as resin. After the material sets or is cured, the water is removed. For this purpose, the ice can be melted to evacuate the water. Alternatively, the ice can be sublimated by converting it into water vapor without turning it into liquid water. This ability to easily sublimate the ice allows for easy and ‘gentle’ removal after casting and solidifying the surrounding structural material.

Carnegie Mellon University researchers turn 3D printing "inside out" by enabling the printing of microscale ice structures
A piezoelectric inkjet nozzle is used to eject water droplets (diameter = 50 µm) onto a cold build platform maintained at -35°C. Planar (X-Y) motion of the build stage is synchronized with droplet discharge to print intricate ice geometries. Credit: College of Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University

A high-resolution 3D printing system is used to deposit water droplets onto a -35°C custom-built temperature-controlled platform that rapidly transforms the water into ice. By modulating the ejection frequency of the water droplets and synchronizing it with movements of the stage, the new process enables printing branched geometries with smooth surfaces and continuous variations in diameter with smooth transitions.

The researchers demonstrated this by printing multiple complex ice geometries, such as a tree, a helix around a pole, and even a one-and-a-half-millimeter tall octopus figurine. The rapid phase change of the water and the strength of the ice enabled freeform 3D printing of ice structures without requiring time-consuming layer-by-layer printing or support structures.

Experimental studies were performed to determine the printing path, motion-stage speed, and droplet frequencies to reproducibly fabricate smooth ice structures with straight, inclined, branching, and hierarchical geometries.

“Controlling so many parameters was challenging,” explained Akash Garg. “We gradually built up in complexity.”

“This is an amazing accomplishment that will bring exciting advances,” commented Burak Ozdoganlar. “We believe this approach has enormous potential to revolutionize tissue engineering and other fields, where miniature structures with complex channels are demanded, such as for microfluidics and soft-robotics.”

Faculty researchers at Carnegie Mellon frequently work together on interdisciplinary teams to solve such engineering and biological challenges.

“One of the wonderful parts of Carnegie Mellon is bringing together people from many different disciplines to develop new approaches and solve problems in unique new ways, which is exactly what occurred here to develop these exciting findings,” said Philip LeDuc.

The researchers acknowledged the great contribution of the late Lee Weiss, who originally constructed the high-resolution 3D printing system. Weiss was a professor in the College of Engineering and School of Computer Science, as well as a founding member of Carnegie Mellon’s Robotics Institute.

The study was published in Advanced Science. While adoption of the 3D ice process for engineering applications such as creating pneumatic channels for soft robotics could be available in as little as a year, its clinical use for tissue engineering will take more time.

Research 2022
Polymer AM Market Opportunities and Trends

741 unique polymer AM companies individually surveyed and studied. Core polymer AM market generated $4.6 billion...

Edward Wakefield

Edward is a freelance writer and additive manufacturing enthusiast looking to make AM more accessible and understandable.

Related Articles

Back to top button

We use cookies to give you the best online experience and for ads personalisation. By agreeing you accept the use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.

Privacy Settings saved!
Privacy Settings

When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. Control your personal Cookie Services here.

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems.

In order to use this website we use the following technically required cookies
  • wordpress_test_cookie
  • wordpress_logged_in_
  • wordpress_sec

Decline all Services
Accept all Services



Join industry leaders and receive the latest insights on what really matters in AM!

This information will never be shared with 3rd parties

I’ve read and accept the privacy policy.*